Saturday, June 15, 2013

There should be a law mandating this, no?


  1. Yes. There should. And I would opine that such a law would be Constitutional. I equate control of useless penises to the regulation of traffic. Driving is not a right. It is a privilege. Thus, licensing operation of motor vehicles and controlling their usage, limiting it to only those who can meet minimum standards of operational ability passes Constitutional muster. The same can be said for a sissy's penis. She is not equipped to meet minimum operational standards. Thus, reasonable controls, such as mandated chastity devices are appropriate governmental intervention. Society will be better off all around.

    1. Well reasoned argument Counselor. I think it might be time we had some Sissy representation at the Supreme Court level. Who should I call to get the nomination process started?

  2. Well yes, of course for a sissy, but I would also argue that breast augmentation must be similarly mandated to eliminate possible confusion with sissy identification by the general public. A sissy should not be able to hide among real men.